<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<XML><RECORDS>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Sander, D.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2008</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Basic tastes and basic emotions: Basic problems, and perspectives for a nonbasic solution [commentary]</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Behavioral and Brain Sciences</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>31</VOLUME>
	<NUMBER>1</NUMBER>
	<PAGES>88-88</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>olfaction,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>odor,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>taste,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>emotion,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>amygdala</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<ABSTRACT>&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Contemporary behavioral and brain scientists consider theexistence of so-called basic emotions in a similar way to the onedescribed by Erickson for so-called basic tastes. Commenting on this analogy, I argue that similar basic problems are encountered in both perspectives, and I suggest a potential nonbasic solution that is tested in emotion research (i.e., the appraisal model of emotion).&lt;/p&gt;</ABSTRACT>
</RECORD>
</RECORDS></XML>